The Ventilator Controversy: Was It Truly Responsible for Most COVID Deaths?


During the COVID-19 pandemic, ventilators emerged as a beacon of hope, a lifeline for those struggling with severe respiratory distress. These machines, which assist patients in breathing by delivering air to their lungs, have undeniably saved countless lives.

But analyses from a study published earlier this year found that most COVID-19 deaths were due to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Now, does this mean ventilators were killing most COVID-19 patients back then?

No, contrary to the misleading headlines from questionable sources, ventilators have not been the cause of 'nearly all' COVID-19 deaths. Dr. Benjamin Singer, a leading pulmonary and critical care physician, emphasizes that it's the virus, not the ventilator, that's the primary culprit. Ventilators serve as a crucial support system, buying time for patients to recover.

The controversial study, led by Dr. Singer, examined 585 individuals who required ventilators due to respiratory failure from 2018 to 2022. The majority of these patients were battling COVID-19 or another infectious disease.

The findings showed that approximately half of these critically ill patients, who would have likely succumbed without intervention, survived their ordeal. The survival rate remained consistent regardless of whether the patient had COVID-19 or another infectious disease.

However, one of the complications of ventilator use is VAP, a type of pneumonia that can arise when bacteria enter the lungs through the breathing tube. Dr. Singer's research revealed that COVID-19 patients on ventilators had a higher risk of developing VAP compared to patients with other forms of pneumonia. But the diagnosis of VAP did not correlate with a higher mortality rate.

Misleading articles have taken these findings out of context. While it's true that 57% of COVID-19 patients on ventilators in the study developed VAP, this doesn't imply that the ventilators were the direct cause of death. Dr. Mark Metersky, another expert in the field, estimates that only about 2% of COVID-19 patients on ventilators succumb to VAP. The primary threat remains the virus itself.

Another unfounded claim is that medical professionals are financially motivated to put patients on ventilators. While hospitals do receive more funding for patients requiring intensive care, such as those on ventilators, this is a reflection of the higher costs associated with providing such care, not a sinister incentive.

During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were claims suggesting that the overuse of ventilators contributed significantly to the initial wave of deaths. Early on, some medical professionals believed that COVID-19 patients should be placed on ventilators sooner than those with other types of pneumonia, fearing that rapid progression of respiratory failure might happen.

However, this approach was soon met with caution, and the practice quickly ceased. The criteria for ventilator use remained consistent with previous standards for pneumonia patients. While the exact impact of early ventilation remains uncertain, research indicates that it didn't significantly alter COVID-19 mortality rates. Experts noted that while a few patients might have been placed on ventilators unnecessarily, it wasn't a widespread issue or conspiracy.

In conclusion, while ventilators are not without risks, they remain an essential tool in the fight against severe COVID-19 cases. It's crucial to base our understanding on scientific evidence rather than misleading headlines.

This is original content from NewsBreak’s Creator Program. Join today to publish and share your own content.

Comments / 315

Published by

MSc (Research) | Named Standford's world's top 1% scientists | Independent scientist | 10x first-author academic papers | 400+ articles on coronavirus


More from Shin

Comments / 0