“To be lonely is to feel unwanted and unloved, and therefore unloveable. Loneliness is a taste of death. No wonder some people who are desperately lonely lose themselves in mental illness or violence to forget the inner pain.” ~ Jean Vanier (Becoming Human)
For much of my early life I was tormented by the plight of insatiable loneliness which threw me into compulsive acting out with substances and people. Being ‘raised’ by a schizophrenic mother and a malignant narcissist for a father ensured that my experiences with bonding would be steeped in annihilation fears. It was only the temporary quiescence of the inevitability of death that offered me respite at those times when I felt most broken and most alone.
Through a daunting journey spanning decades of therapy and sundry healing modalities I’ve come to recognize that the primary source of my pain was deeply rooted in a loneliness so traumatic that I had no Self to grab onto, along with a tragically primitive idea of love.
Being a chronological adult with unmet infancy needs is debilitating. I desperately latched onto whatever and whomever would offer some relief from my devouring abyss of need.
Hence, it makes sense, given my personal history that many of the men and women I render therapy to evince the agony of loneliness rooted in incessant relational trauma. Validating and giving credibility to this form of suffering, especially in a world so fixated on self-sufficiency and autonomy is my intention with crafting this article. I also hope to encourage those beset by relational trauma to seek a healing humanistic bond with a clinician, which can serve as a corrective attachment template so that new meaningful life affirming relationships can form.
Relational trauma pertains to a “violation of human connection” (Judith Herman 1992), which result in attachment injuries.
These relational traumas encompass a vast range of violations, inclusive of childhood abuse, domestic violence, entrapment, rape, infidelity, bullying, rejection, psychological/emotional abuse, and complex grief rooted in unresolved loss of important human connections.
The consequences of these relational traumas are profound, particularly when they are the result of generational patterns passed on to children.
Psychodynamic theorist Gerald Adler attributed an early failure in nurturing to the experience of annihilation.
Adler contended that the absence of a primary positive soothing introject/caregiver creates an insatiable emptiness that impedes the development of an organized Self.
Additionally, the ongoing exposure to negative persecutory introjects such as abusive parents, further exacerbates the threat of annihilation.
Furthermore, the relational bond between an infant and its primary caretaker impacts the structure and function of the developing infant’s brain.
Abuse and neglect within the child-parent attachment bond is absorbed as cellular memory, causing neural dysregulation and consequentially an imprint of trauma that may be reenacted throughout life.
Likewise, if primary bonding is characterized by safety and mirroring, neurological integration can develop normally and an imprint of relationships as affording safety and pleasure occurs.
Consequently, the psychological repercussions of relational trauma are manifold.
Impairments with relatedness to others, affect regulation, difficulties with emotional self-regulation and behavioral control, alterations in consciousness, self-destructive behaviors, and a nihilistic world-view embody the plight of complex relational trauma.
The relationally traumatized individual vacillates between pseudo-autonomy and needy desperation, relentlessly seeking rescue and rejecting real intimacy.
Unable to empathically attune to others, vocalize intrinsic needs/desires, and fearful of hurt and rejection, yet hungry for attachment (s)he repetitiously recreates the destructive cycle of maltreatment and disorganized ambivalent attachment. I am seeing these subconscious patterns play out in a group I’m facilitating for survivors of character disordered parents. It is disorienting and sad to witness.
Difficulties with regulating emotions and affect manifest in aggressive posturing, behavioral problems and addictive disorders.
Ubiquitous despair, self-hatred, and hopelessness contribute to a radically cynical perspective, which asserts life is devoid of all meaning and purpose.
he paradox of healing from relational trauma is that it is what is most feared which will repair and restore. Psychologist Carl Rogers emphasized the essential elements of unconditional positive regard, genuineness, and empathy as the reparative force inherent in a successful client-therapist relationship.
Rogers wrote, “When a person realizes he has been deeply heard, his eyes moisten. I think in some real sense he is weeping for joy. It is as though he were saying, “Thank God, somebody heard me. Someone knows what it’s like to be me.”
As philanthropist Jean Vanier points out “when we love and respect people, revealing to them their value, they can begin to come out from behind the walls that protect them.”
Thus, when a relationally traumatized client engages in a therapeutic process with a clinician who offers the opportunity for corrective connection, healing can occur. In the context of such a relationship, traumas can be effectively processed. Successful treatment necessitates allowing sufferers of relational trauma to safely know and experience all which has been disowned and silenced.