Online accusations, Internet assault, and trial by algorithms are here to stay
In a recent workshop on low-budget film production, the moderator asked the class if anyone had Googled his name. I did, and what I discovered concerned me. Gary had recently been sued for breach of contract and stealing a writer’s screenplay.
Online, Gary was trolled and targeted to be ‘canceled’: The shady film producer who swindled an unsuspecting screenwriter — poaching his idea, bilking him out of millions. ‘The Movie Thief’. ‘The Film-Flam Man’.
“If you did, you’ll read about my lawsuit,” Gary confessed. Kudos to him for standing up. Instead of brushing it off, Gary provided his side of the story.
Gary’s defense claimed he never forged a deal, nor the semblance of one with this screenwriter. Gary’s interest piqued over the script’s premise, but he never optioned or pursued the screenplay beyond a pitch session.
In the meantime, Gary’s legal team uncovered a jaded screenwriter frustrated with his lack of success. Instead of upping his game with saleable scripts, this screenwriter looked for someone to blame and fleece for his failure.
When the plaintiff and his scheme were outed, Gary was cleared of any wrongdoing. The lawsuit was dismissed and the situation went away. Well, almost.
Gary’s dilemma involves a higher volume of online articles linking him to the accusation than the resolution. Despite the litigation’s expulsion, there aren’t enough entries about Gary’s vindication to trigger the algorithms.
With less in cyberspace about the outcome, the falsity of the lawsuit outweighs the truth — the dark underbelly of Internet storage.
Because of these articles, the accused criminality continues to dog Gary. In every workshop’s introduction, he needs to address and explain the lawsuit.
Missing facts could haunt the rest of us as well. Think about those who don’t care for online profiles, platforms, and an all-around presence. We all know many who might be linked and tagged here and there, but not much else.
These people have chosen to avoid social media and savor their low profile. They also remain serious and vigilant about their privacy.
Consider the folks in our lives who could be vulnerable to this type of malfeasance. Despite a shady lawsuit getting axed by the courts, the charges alone could fester online. If so, they’d anchor these people to negative and in some cases, illegal situations.
In the wake of our calling-out and rush to judgment culture, these types of problems are no longer farfetched. Such events could create less-than-favorable profiles as well.
Now the unfortunate are linked to affairs and information dumps they never sought in the first place. Because of their limited presence, there’s nothing to compete with the algorithms that place these sluglines in a web search.
Consider the local business owner or the finalist for a job opening. People who might get Googled for background checks. They might have been cleared of false charges, but remain at risk for sabotage.
What happens then — to these and other innocent people? Where’s the justice in this?
Who has the answer? What are the logical and plausible steps to expunge such articles? To add addendums? My guess and no pun — virtually impossible.
This is original content from NewsBreak’s Creator Program. Join today to publish and share your own content.