Title 42 is a controversial immigration order implemented during the Trump administration, which has continued to be enforced under the Biden administration.
It allows the government to expel migrants, including asylum seekers, without due process during specific public health emergencies. However, many argue that its use violates federal and international law. "During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration used this provision (section 265) to block land entry for many migrants generally. The Biden administration has continued this practice with expansion. " according to Wikipedia.
Since Title 42 was implemented, over 2.4 million migrants have been expelled from the U.S.-Mexico border, including Haitian asylum seekers, Venezuelans, and Mexicans. Despite criticism and legal challenges, the Biden administration has continued to defend its use in court.
The legal issue at the heart of the controversy is that no provision in the law allows the government to expel migrants without due process. Critics argue that Title 42 is being used as an excuse to deny migrants their right to seek asylum, a fundamental principle of international law.
One of the most significant concerns with Title 42 is that it puts vulnerable migrants at risk.
The influx of migrants from Haiti last year, for instance, came after a period of civil unrest and a devastating earthquake that left many Haitians in dire need of humanitarian assistance. Many Haitian migrants had also lived in South America for years and were going to the U.S. to seek asylum. However, Title 42 resulted in many of them being expelled without adequate screening for COVID-19 or the opportunity to make humanitarian claims.
This policy is set to expire on May 11, and as a result, those who enter the country illegally will be held to a more stringent initial asylum standard. This will likely result in most migrants failing to meet the standard and facing swift deportation from the United States.
While the Department of Homeland Security plans to continue using Title 42 until the December 21 deadline to rescind the protocols, a recent court ruling ordered its end. Nonetheless, the legal battle is far from over, and its fate remains uncertain.
That decision is now being challenged in litigation brought by a group of states that oppose the winddown of Title 42. Anti-immigrant lawmakers also seek to codify Title 42 and keep it in place by tying it to the emergency declaration that provides vital COVID-19 measures.
Human rights advocates argue that the U.S. needs to adopt a more humane approach to immigration that respects the rights of migrants and refugees. They argue that the U.S. has a moral and legal obligation to protect vulnerable populations, including those fleeing persecution and violence in their home countries.
In conclusion, Title 42 is a controversial immigration order that has sparked widespread criticism from human rights advocates and protracted legal battles.
While its fate remains uncertain, the debate over its use highlights the urgent need for a more humane and approach to immigration that respects the rights and dignity of all individuals.
What are your thoughts on this?