Federal Judge Blocks Biden's WOTUS Environmental Regulations, Impacting Tennessee Farmers and Residents

John M. Dabbs

In a recent development, a federal judge has blocked the Biden administration from implementing new environmental regulations redefining how water sources are protected under the Clean Water Act. The regulations, known as the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule, were announced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in December 2022, and they were scheduled to go into effect on March 20, 2023.

The decision was made in response to a lawsuit filed on January 18, 2023, by Texas and Idaho, challenging the new WOTUS rule. Judge Jeffrey Brown, who presided over the case, determined that the rule “poses irreparable harm” to residents of the two states. While he declined to issue a nationwide injunction, Brown noted that 25 other states have also challenged the rule in two separate ongoing lawsuits.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the charge against the new regulations, said the decision was a significant victory against what he called “destructive federal overreach.” He added, “The unlawful rule would have saddled Texans across the state with crushing new regulations, slowing our state’s economic development and limiting our job growth. Securing an injunction stops the rule from going into effect. This is an important victory protecting the people of Texas from federal overreach."

The WOTUS rule ultimately opens the door for the federal government to regulate wetlands, lakes, ponds, streams and "relatively permanent" waterways, largely mimicking a pre-2015 environmental rule set during the Obama administration that implemented changes to curb water pollution. The regulation is a broad interpretation of which water sources require protection under the Clean Water Act.

Tennessee, as an agricultural state, is significantly impacted by the new WOTUS rule. Farmers, ranchers, and landowners in the state have been vocal in their opposition to the new regulations, arguing that it would be detrimental to their businesses and livelihoods. The rule would have imposed significant new regulatory burdens and made it difficult for them to manage their land.

The Tennessee Farm Bureau, which represents more than 600,000 farmers in the state, released a statement expressing their support for the injunction, saying it would prevent farmers from being burdened with unnecessary regulations. The bureau noted that farmers are the best stewards of their land and work hard to protect the environment while also producing the food and fiber that people rely on every day.

The Tennessee Cattlemen’s Association, which represents cattle farmers in the state, also expressed their support for the injunction. They argued that the WOTUS rule would have hurt their industry, leading to higher costs for consumers and decreased profitability for farmers.

The Biden administration has not yet responded to the injunction, but it is expected to appeal the decision. In the meantime, opponents of the WOTUS rule are celebrating the injunction as a significant victory against what they call federal overreach. The ruling is likely to impact the ongoing debate over environmental regulations, particularly as it pertains to the Clean Water Act and the role of the federal government in protecting the nation's water resources.

Comments / 35

Published by

An outdoor enthusiast with a passion for travel and adventure, John is a consultant and writer..

Bristol, TN

More from John M. Dabbs

Comments / 0