Did you know that AI is now making waves in the adult entertainment industry? Yes, you read that right. We're talking about AI-generated images of individuals that don't exist. And believe it or not, there's a market for it. Who knew that in the future, we wouldn't just have deepfake videos but deepfake images too? What a time to be alive!
According to the Washington Post, some creators are sharing AI-generated explicit images of adult women wearing diapers. When asked about the authenticity of these images, the creator responded, "I don’t expect the person I’m looking at online to be the person they say they are. I’m not going to meet this person in real life." Talk about not being fazed by fake images! But hey, as long as they're getting paid, right?
Now, some creators are cool with it, while others feel cheated after realizing that the models they interacted with were likely AI-generated. It's not just individuals using AI-generated images either. Rolling Stone reports that two computer science students created a fake porn model called Claudia using an AI image generator as a joke. They made about $100 from unsuspecting users on subreddits before getting caught for AI catfishing. Hey, that's enough for a fancy dinner, but probably not worth the trouble they're getting into.
It's a murky area, with potential legal and ethical implications. But hey, at least there's no consent or risk of exposing real people, right? As AI image generation continues to advance, it's likely that we'll see more fake images of individuals, not just in the adult industry, but in other areas as well. It's a wild, wild world out there.
At the end of the day, it's important to remember that these AI-generated images may not be real, but the consequences of using them can be. So, if you're browsing through some AI-generated adult images and wondering if they're real or not, just remember: if it seems too good to be true, it probably is. And if you come across Claudia, don't be fooled. She may look like a dime, but she's just a digital illusion.
Comments / 0