Kamala Harris goes to France to talk about Libya.

Jason Robbins

Kamala Harris's third foreign trip will be a trip to France so she can talk to Macron about the European migrant crisis. Kamala Harris will travel to France on Monday for four days of meetings with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and other European leaders as they gather in Paris to mark Armistice Day, which commemorates the end of World War I. While there she will take part in the Paris peace conference on Libya, a diplomatic effort aimed at helping Libya achieve peaceful elections. Disputes over elections scheduled for December 24 threaten to derail Libya’s efforts to end a decade of chaos and violence. “We want to show our support for the Libyan people as they move toward national elections and focus on the importance of withdrawing foreign forces and mercenaries,” a US official said.

Libya is a war-torn country from which a good amount of European refugees come. If the peace conference succeeds in providing democracy to Libya it will significantly decrease the number of people migrating to Libya. Vice President Harris has come under attack recently because of her poor handling of the Border crises here in the US so many aren't sure her efforts will fix the problem in Libya. Her trip to France will also include a meeting with Macron to discuss the United States' diplomacy with France. Australia bailed on a submarine contract with France worth $66 billion, choosing instead to work with the United States and the United Kingdom, because of this France's diplomacy with the United States isn't as good as it once was.

Comments / 0

Published by

Jason Robbins is an independent journalist who writes about a variety of topics.

Mt Vernon, OH

More from Jason Robbins

James Buchanan VS Richard Nixon

James Buchanan is remembered as the worst president because of his poor handling of the issue of slavery. He was morally opposed to slavery however he believed it was protected by the constitution. He also didn't do anything to stop the faction of proslavery states that later became the Confederacy. However, it is believed that the reason he didn't do anything about slavery is that he wanted to stop the inevitable war with the Confederacy. But Richard Nixon might have been a worse president than James Buchanan. Richard Nixon was remembered as the president that improved America's diplomatic relationship with the People's Republic of China. He also opened trade with China which was the first step to helping a communist nation build its economy. The trade relations that American has with China due to Richard Nixon's presidency are part of the reason that China had the money to make its military so powerful. With China's military so powerful it essentially started a second cold war between America and China. The other big criticism of Richard Nixon is the Watergate scandal, which was a major scandal involving Nixon's administration. The scandal stemmed from the Nixon administration repeatedly attempting to cover up their involvement in the June 17, 1972 break-in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters. Witnesses testified that Nixon had approved plans to cover up the administration involved in the break-in. The Watergate scandal was the event that Convinced him to resign from his position as president. So think who was worse the president that tried to preserve peace or the president that funded communism and could one day be responsible for the demise of our nation. If you have any questions or comments I will reply in the comment section.

Read full story

Opinion: International Diplomacy is Complex

International diplomacy is an ideology that emphasizes a focus on improving relations with foreign countries. Left-wingers also believe that international diplomacy is a good thing on top of this they believe that our government shouldn't increase military spending, however, right-wingers saying that you should focus on increasing military spending over international diplomacy so which is the most logical way to go? Well like many things in politics it's not as simple as people believe. The idea of increasing international diplomacy and not worrying about military spending could result in us being invaded by a country or group of countries that don't like us. If you think that's unlikely polls show that the United States is one of the most hated countries in the world. However, let's look at the right-wingers' perspective. The idea of increasing military spending and not worrying about international diplomacy could also have a bad outcome. If we stop worrying about international diplomacy then other countries might try to get rid of us. Essentially both having a strong military and increasing international diplomacy are very important. So the question that we should be asking is how do we preserve international diplomacy and also increase military spending. Joe Biden unlike other left-wingers supports an increase to $753 billion in military spending, which is a 1.6% increase from the FY2021 budget. The only downside is this may not be enough money to compensate for what we lost in Afghanistan. What do you think? Leave your opinion on the comment page.

Read full story

Comments / 0