Opinion: Christianity should not influence American politics, but it does

Edy Zoo

The founding fathers of the United States of America made a conscious effort to ensure that Christianity would not dominate American politics.

Their reasons were two-fold:

  • Firstly, the founders recognized that America was diverse, with many religious beliefs and practices. Therefore, they felt it would be unjust to privilege any religion over others.
  • Secondly, they sought to create an inclusive society where all people could live freely according to their faiths without government interference.

As a result, the idea of separating church and state became a cornerstone of the early American political system. And it remains an essential part of our democracy to this day.

Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Washington, and John Adams favored religious freedom and equality. And they attempted to incorporate into the Constitution implied freedom of religion. Although, in time, legal precedents were set to claim religious freedom over government control.

However, recently there have been attempts by various religious groups to intertwine Christianity into American politics. Yet, these attempts to inject Christianity into the political process are misguided and counterproductive.

To begin with, according to Britannica, Christianity is a

major religion stemming from the life, teachings, and death of Jesus of Nazareth (the Christ, or the Anointed One of God) in the 1st century CE."

This means that Christianity is a personal belief system; ergo, it should not be imposed on others through the political process. Similarly, the core tenets of Christianity, such as love and compassion for one's fellow man, are antithetical to partisan politics because they transcend all differences in race, gender, or socioeconomic status. In like manner, Christianity is not well suited to address the complex issues modern society faces.

Given these concerns, we must seriously consider the role of religion in politics. In particular, we need to ask ourselves whether it is appropriate for religious leaders and groups to influence national politics.

On the one hand, some may argue that the personal beliefs of individuals should be respected, even if they differ from the views of the majority or those in power. After all, many believe that religion plays a vital role in their lives, providing spiritual guidance and moral clarity. And our democracy was founded on respecting religious freedom and equality for all people.

However, others might contend that religious beliefs are fundamentally incompatible with effective leadership because they often stem from faith rather than reason or empirical evidence. In their minds, religious leaders can be ineffective regarding paramount issues like economics or social justice because they need more specific knowledge or expertise on these complex topics.

To justify their convictions, religious contrarians point to our rapidly changing economy and labor markets. It presents incredible challenges for policymakers as they struggle to maintain a sustainable balance between economic growth and financial stability. Likewise, they must curtail the efforts of major corporations constantly seeking ways to maximize profits at the expense of laborers and even entire communities that rely on these businesses for jobs and services.

Clearly, we need leaders with sound judgment who have an in-depth understanding of economics to navigate this rugged terrain successfully. Above all, we do not need religious leaders rooted in dogma rather than analysis or evidence-based reasoning.

Equally important, many see Christianity as a source of division rather than unity, particularly regarding hot-button issues like gay rights or abortion. And this division does not reflect the evolving attitudes of most Americans today.

In Holier Than You and Me: 'Religious Liberty' is the New Bully Pulpit and its Meaning is Endangering Our Way of Life by Marsha B. Freeman of Barry University, she writes,

Anti-gay marriage opponents, having lost the overall battle, have evolved into anti-LGBT forces, citing many of the same concerns and couching them in terms of safety and religious freedom."

As a result, many have grown weary of divisive debates motivated by religious beliefs. Indeed, many Christian churches hold extremely conservative views about multiple social topics. In a Pew Research, 52% of Christians who identified as Republicans believe,

There are clear standards for what is right and wrong."

However, those standards vary across political parties. So much so that sometimes conservative Christians have used their influence in politics to promote discrimination against marginalized groups like LGBTQ individuals or women seeking access to legal abortions.

With so much at stake politically and economically in today's world – including global climate change and threats from violent extremism – we cannot afford to continue this cycle of mistrust and hostility when discussing sensitive issues related to religion.

Against this backdrop, we need more secular voices engaged in policymaking to help bridge this growing divide between different factions in our society. To achieve a truly inclusive and just society where everyone is valued and respected regardless of personal beliefs or background, we must focus on rational solutions driven by reason rather than dogma or doctrine.

Let me know what you think. Can Christianity coexist with politics, or are its religious views too narrow to cope with society's needs?

This is original content from NewsBreak’s Creator Program. Join today to publish and share your own content.

Comments / 54

Published by

Edy Zoo is an author who writes about social subjects. He contributes to the ever-growing library of social critics. He approaches local social subjects and local news covering Auburn-Opelika and surrounding cities from an objective point of view. He also holds liberal views.

Auburn, AL
7K followers

More from Edy Zoo

Comments / 0