Opinion: Hate to Admit That Tuberville Was Actually Right Saying This About the Military

Ashleigh Nicole
Tommy TubervillePhoto byGetty images

In the midst of ongoing debates surrounding military education and ideological influences within the Department of Defense (DOD), it's clear that questions about the direction of America's military leadership are far from simple. The controversies extend beyond the classroom and into the realm of political statements, raising concerns about the alignment of military priorities and political ideologies.

Controversy Surrounding Space Force General's Comments on State LGBT Laws

The military community was recently stirred by a controversial statement made by Space Force Chief Operations Officer Lt. Gen. DeAnna Burt during an official Department of Defense Pride Month commemoration. Burt's remarks criticized state laws banning sex changes and gender education, contending that they posed a threat to military readiness. She even suggested that military officers could be assigned based on state LGBT laws rather than qualifications, igniting concerns about the potential politicization of military assignments.

In response to this controversy, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall addressed the matter before Congress, acknowledging that Lt. Gen. Burt's comments had gone too far. Kendall emphasized that military personnel assignments are not influenced by state laws, seeking to provide clarity on the situation.

Controversial Curriculum at the Command and General Staff College (CGSC)

Meanwhile, Army Majors attending Intermediate Level Education (ILE) at CGSC in Fort Leavenworth have been immersed in a different kind of controversy. The course titled "Race and Gender in U.S. Military History," taught by Dr. Angela Riotto, has garnered significant attention.

Within this course, students encounter perspectives that assert only the dominant racial group (often understood as white individuals) can be racist, while all other ethnicities are described as merely prejudiced in their actions. Additionally, the course teaches that gender is a social construct, while sex is a biological category assigned at birth, prompting debates among students.

Vignette from Race and Gender in U.S. Military History currently being taught in ILEPhoto byNIAS

One of the course's pivotal moments focuses on definitions of prejudice, racism, gender, and sex. This has led to questions about the role of military education in shaping the perspectives and beliefs of future leaders. Critics argue that the curriculum has strayed from its core mission of preparing military officers for warfighting and leadership, while proponents contend it fosters inclusivity and addresses historic inequities.

Political Statements and Controversies

Beyond the classroom, political statements have also contributed to the discourse surrounding the military. For instance, Senator Tommy Tuberville's recent comment regarding the confirmation of Air Force Gen. Charles “CQ” Brown Jr. as the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stirred controversy. Tuberville's remarks, in which he questioned Brown's comments on race and social justice in the military, raised eyebrows.

Tuberville stated:

Let me tell you something: Our military is not an equal-opportunity employer…We don’t want to single-handedly destroy our military from within."

These comments added to the ongoing debate about diversity, equity, and inclusion in the armed forces and the role of political statements in shaping military policy. It's a dangerous path to veer off on. Our military should be like the Spartans, with top physical and mental conditions an absolute requirement.

In summary, the controversies surrounding military education and political statements shine a spotlight on the issues that are derived from integrating diverse viewpoints and societal discussions within the armed forces. These incidents raise undeniable questions about the current direction of the military, its mission, and its leadership. As the battle continues, it's clear that finding common ground or eliminating ideological divides remains a challenge for America's military leadership.

Please share this story on social media if you enjoyed reading it!

As always, thank you for reading! Your support means a lot. You can follow my work on X (formerly Twitter) @PressRealz, and my newsletter. Got a story you want me to track down? Let me know in an email to newsbreakcontributor@gmail.com

This is original content from NewsBreak’s Creator Program. Join today to publish and share your own content.

Comments / 0

Published by

Ashleigh Nicole is an Alabama-based writer and freelancer, bringing a unique blend of culinary expertise and creative storytelling to the world of writing. The former executive chef at a prominent French bistro was forced to rethink career choice after COVID-19. She is now a truth seeker and news junkie sharing what she finds with her audience. Drawing from her diverse experiences, Ashleigh now uses her storytelling abilities to captivate readers and offer a fresh perspective.

Alabama State

More from Ashleigh Nicole

Comments / 0